The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) has seen a slight increase in pass rates for its SQE1 assessments, with 56% of candidates successfully navigating the latest sitting. However, this news comes amidst a storm of controversy following a significant exam blunder by Kaplan, the exam administrator, which led to 175 students being erroneously told they had failed when they had actually passed.
This article explores the implications of the marking error, the responses from Kaplan and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), and the broader impact on the legal profession.
Pass Rate Statistics
-
SQE1 January 2024: 56% pass rate
-
SQE1 July 2023: 53% pass rate
-
SQE1 January 2023: 51% pass rate
The pass rate for the January 2024 sitting of the SQE1 exam saw 56% of the 6,061 candidates passing. This marks a slight increase from the previous sitting where 53% were successful, and is higher than the January 2023 sitting, which saw only 51% of candidates pass.
For first-time exam takers, the pass rate was slightly higher than the average at 59%, consistent with recent sittings where first-time candidates were 3% more likely to pass.
It's interesting to note the gradual increase in the SQE1 pass rate from January 2023 to January 2024, indicating potential improvements in candidate preparation or exam administration. Additionally, the higher pass rate for first-time exam takers suggests that candidates are becoming more successful with each sitting, possibly due to better understanding of the exam format and content.
SQE1 Marking Error
A technical error in calculating scaled scores from raw scores was revealed when students began appealing their original scores, leading to 175 candidates eventually receiving the correct results after being wrongly informed of their failure in parts of the SQE1 exam. This error not only caused confusion and distress but also raised questions about the integrity of the exam process. Candidates expressed frustration and anxiety, highlighting the impact of such errors on their confidence and future prospects in the legal profession.
This incident has sparked discussions among stakeholders and SQE training providers about the reliability of the current assessment provider, Kaplan, with some suggesting that such errors may warrant a change in the provider.
Industry Response
The legal community has responded with concern to the marking error, with many questioning the reliability of the SQE exam process. The timing of the error, coming shortly after the SRA announced a 5% increase in SQE exam fees, has raised further questions about the transparency and accountability of the exam administration process.
Some law firms have rescinded training contract offers from students who failed the January SQE1 sitting.
Apology and Remedial Actions
In response to the error, Kaplan and the SRA have issued apologies to affected candidates. Kaplan has offered a goodwill payment of £250 to those impacted by the error and has waived the exam fee for 22 candidates who were uncertain about their eligibility for the SQE2 exam.
Support for Affected SQE1 Candidates
In addition to the apologies and goodwill gestures from Kaplan and the SRA, there has been an outpouring of support for the affected candidates from the legal community. Many have offered words of encouragement and assistance to those who have been impacted by the error, highlighting the solidarity and camaraderie within the profession.
Some firms have reportedly reached out to the affected SQE1 candidates to express their support and to discuss potential reinstatement of training contracts. This response underscores the legal industry's commitment to fairness and professionalism in handling such unforeseen circumstances.
Calls for Accountability and Reform
The incident has also sparked calls for greater accountability from exam administrators and the regulatory bodies overseeing the SQE. Some are calling for reforms to the exam system to ensure that such errors are less likely to occur in the future. This may include changes to the way exams are marked and administered, as well as increased oversight and quality control measures.
Conclusion: Mistakes Happen
While the increase in SQE1 pass rates is a positive development, the marking error by Kaplan has cast a shadow over the exam process. However, it serves as a reminder that mistakes can happen even in highly regulated environments. It is essential for exam administrators and regulatory bodies to take swift and effective action to rectify such errors and ensure that affected candidates are appropriately compensated.